This map uses NASA's public topography data to show the shape of our world. The height is exaggerated, because otherwise you'll barely notice anything(Earth is pretty smooth overall, you see).
We've all seen the world map. Either be it the infamously inaccurate Mercator, or slightly better Equirectangular, they don't really give you the whole picture of the planet Earth. I mean, can you really imagine all the continents being a one giant Pangaea at some point just by looking at the world map? They all seem so…… separate!
While a regular world map lets you easily tell the latitude and longitude of a place, it is horribly misleading when you're trying to learn the actual shape of the earth. (Comparison using True Size)
Below is a comparison between the Mercator Projection and the Peirce Quincunial Projection I've used for this model. Notice the size differences of Greenland, northern Russia, and Antartica.
The four corners of the map can tile together to form a view from the South Pole!
Of course, even this Peirce Quincunial projection I've used isn't 100% accrate — lands closer to equator are slightly bigger (opposite problem of Mercator projection, though much less extreme).
There is no 2D map projection that displays every land 100% accurately. It is mathematically impossible
https://www.thetruesize.com/ for country size comparisons
NASA for Earth topography data
Justin Kunimune for his amazing software
Youtuber Sebastian Lague for sparking my interest in maps
The author hasn't provided the model origin yet.